(ÆÛ¿È)
Commoner¶ó´Â ¿µ±¹¿¡¼ ¹ß°£ÇÏ´Â Áøº¸Àû À¥Àú³ÎÀÌ Àִµ¥¿ä,
°Å±â 4È£(2002³â 5¿ù)¿¡ ½Ç¸° ³í¹®ÀÌ ¸Å¿ì Èï¹Ì·Ó½À´Ï´Ù.
R. BarbrookÀ̶ó°í Àü¿¡ Science as Culture¿¡´Ù°¡ "California Ideology"¶ó´Â
±ÛÀ» ½Ç¾î Å« ³íÀïÀ» ºÒ·¯ ÀÏÀ¸Ä×´ø ³íÀÚÀε¥, ¾Æ·¡ ±Û¿¡¼´Â ÀÎÅͳÝÀÌ Á¤Ä¡Àû
°Ë¿¿¡¼´Â ¹þ¾î³µÁö¸¸ ÀÌÁ¦´Â °æÁ¦Àû °Ë¿ÀÇ ¾Ð·ÂÀÌ ½ÉÇØÁ® Digital PanopticonÀÌ
µÉ À§Çè¿¡ óÇØ ÀÖ´Ù ÁöÀûÇÏ°í ÀÖ±º¿ä.
±×·±µ¥ ÀÌ´Â Fordist Media ¸ðµ¨·Î¼ °áÄÚ ¹Ù¶÷Á÷ÇÏÁö ¾Ê°í, ³×ƼÁð »çÀÌ¿¡ Á¤º¸°¡
ÀÚÀ¯·Ó°Ô °øÀ¯µÇ´Â Post-fordist Media ¸ðµ¨À» ÁöÇâÇØ¾ß ÇÑ´Ù°í ¼³ÆÄÇÏ°í
ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù.
- Richard Barbrook. The Regulation of Liberty: free speech, free trade and
free gifts on the Net
Richard Barbrook explores emerging commons in cyberspace. In the mid-1990s,
neo-liberals claimed that state regulation of the Net was impossible. Free
markets would create free speech. This libertarian rhetoric lost its appeal
as increasing numbers of people started swapping music and video files over
the Net. Free speech meant free gifts. In the early-2000s, neo-liberals are
now demanding more state regulation of the Net to protect intellectual
property. Free markets depend upon economic censorship.
However, this attempt to regulate the Net in the interests of intellectual
property is already failing. In the digital age, media xists both as
commodities and gifts - and hybrids of the two
http://www.commoner.org.uk/04barbrook.pdf
|